Rixx

Hey PH! I built Rixx because AI search tools were giving confident answers that were just wrong. Rixx gives you cited answers from the live web every claim is traceable to a real source. You can also upload your own PDFs, docs and links, see data as charts, and organize everything into Insights. Would love brutal honest feedback what would make this your default search?

<p>How exhaustive is the search? Does it cap the number of web searches and pages visited, or does it go until it hits a goal of credibility? Also, can it handle JS-rendered pages, PDFs and Images? I ask because I've built my own internal method that does this but would love to not have to manage it and none of the stock research tools are cost-effective, including Parallel AI's Find All or Deep Research (let alone Perplexity or stock Claude)</p>

<p>The “from search to publishable research” promise is the interesting part. Citations are necessary, but for writing/research workflows the bigger trust question is usually claim shape: did the AI preserve what the source actually says, or did it turn a narrow source into a broad conclusion?</p><p></p><p>One feature I’d love is a claim table before publishing: claim, supporting sources, source strength, and any caveat/contradiction Rixx found. That would make the final blog/report feel less like a generated answer with links and more like research you can safely stand behind.</p>

<p>Congrats, Rixx feels useful if it can keep that whole chain together instead of creating another tab in the research mess. How do you handle source quality when generating cited answers?</p>