PHI
Sync
PHI
Startup Intelligence
Markets
  • Signal Feed
  • All Startups
  • Live Launches
  • Breakout Momentum
  • Opportunity Radar
  • Categories
  • Founders
  • Revenue
  • Cross-platform
Intelligence
  • Ask Market
  • Signature Index
  • Insights
  • Trend Genome
  • Analytics
Lab
  • Tagline Lab
  • Smart Search
Yours
  • Watchlist
  • Alerts
  • Search
Sync now
PHI
Startup Intelligence
Markets
  • Signal Feed
  • All Startups
  • Live Launches
  • Breakout Momentum
  • Opportunity Radar
  • Categories
  • Founders
  • Revenue
  • Cross-platform
Intelligence
  • Ask Market
  • Signature Index
  • Insights
  • Trend Genome
  • Analytics
Lab
  • Tagline Lab
  • Smart Search
Yours
  • Watchlist
  • Alerts
  • Search
/
11,067 products · 19,805 snapshots
Humalike

Humalike

#2 today

Give your AI agents the social intelligence they're missing

Launched 25d agoProduct Hunt Website
Votes
454
Comments
165

What this means

3.2×Growing 3.2× faster than the typical AI Agents launch.
Compared to 74 AI Agents launches at the same age.
60%Top-5 finish probability today: 60%.
Projected 454 votes by end of day-1 (range 341–613).
36%Unusually high discussion quality.
165 comments on 454 votes — buying intent or strong opinion in the comments.
-35%Category cooling: Developer Tools.
Launches down 35% week-over-week.
60%Strong buyer-intent signal in the comments.
60% of commenters sound like potential buyers — mostly developers.
70%Comment sentiment overwhelmingly positive.
Audience strongly receptive — developers engaged.
Users are asking for improved emotional detection + better handling of pauses.
Feature requests surfaced from the comment thread.
Recurring concerns: agents interrupting too often, lack of personality in agents.
Pain points mentioned more than once in comments.
13.6×Founder historically performs 13.6× the platform average.
Best prior launch: Loomal (269 votes).

Prediction

Top-5 finish probability
60%
today
Projected end-of-day votes
454range 341–613
Trajectory
stable
Vote pace holding steady.
Speed vs peers
3.2×
74 AI Agents launches

About

Today's models are capable enough. Smart enough. Fast enough. But we still feel they don’t fit in the room. Humalike is building the behavioral infrastructure for humanlike AI agents. The social skills & proactiveness your agents have been missing. APIs, models, benchmarks.

AI Summary

Humalike provides APIs and models designed to enhance the social intelligence of AI agents, enabling more humanlike interactions. The platform focuses on developing behavioral infrastructure and benchmarks for improved agent proactiveness.

Vote & comment velocity

Scores

Velocity11.6
Vote pace vs avg
Momentum11.6
Sustained over 6h
Virality27.8
Spread × engagement
Engagement72.7
Comments per vote

Founders

Kruti Parekh
Kruti Parekh
@krutiparekh16
rep 55
Rohan Chaubey
@rohanrecommends · hunter

Topics

Developer ToolsArtificial IntelligenceAPI

Comment Intelligence· 21 comments analysed

Sentiment

Positive70%
Neutral20%
Negative10%
Buyer intent
60%
of commenters sound like potential buyers
Audience
developers
Sentiment over 12 days
Positive
Negative
Buyer intent
Overall vibe

Overall, commenters are excited about the product's potential but raise concerns about social behavior and user experience.

Top themes
  • turn-taking
  • social intelligence
  • API integration
  • user experience
  • community management
Feature requests
  • improved emotional detection
  • better handling of pauses
  • more nuanced social behavior
  • benchmarking tools
  • user feedback mechanisms
Complaints
  • agents interrupting too often
  • lack of personality in agents
  • socially exhausting interactions
  • difficulty in reading the room
  • unclear evaluation metrics

Top comments

[REDACTED]
↑ 33

<p>Hey PH 👋 Martí here, co-founder of Humalike.<br></p><p><strong>What is Humalike?</strong> The behavioral infrastructure for humanlike AI agents. The social skills your agents have been missing.<br></p><p><strong>The problem</strong><br>A few months ago we built an AI community manager. The second it hit a group chat, everyone knew it was a bot. It talked over people, never knew when to shut up. More features didn't fix it. Today's models are capable enough. Smart enough. Fast enough. But we still feel they don’t fit in the room.<br></p><p><strong>The solution: 7 behavioral APIs</strong></p><ul><li><p><strong>Turn-Taking (Flagship)</strong>: Knows when to speak and when to stay silent (bundles all other APIs in one).</p></li><li><p><strong>Theory of Mind</strong>: It gives your agent a sense of what people really think and feel.</p></li><li><p><strong>Norms</strong>: Reads the group’s tone and responds the way it’s accepted here.</p></li><li><p><strong>Persona</strong>: Improve presonality so it’s Opinionated, takes sides, backed by real community data</p></li><li><p><strong>Social Memory</strong>: It gives your agent a memory for people, who they are and what matters to them.</p></li><li><p><strong>Social Signals</strong>: Catches the pause before sending, a removed reaction, and an edited message.</p></li><li><p><strong>Social Observability</strong>: Sees who’s engaged, who’s bored, and who’s annoyed.</p></li></ul><p>Model, use-case and stack agnostic, built for <strong>groups, not just 1:1</strong>.<br></p><p><strong>Extra highlights</strong></p><ul><li><p>💸 <strong>$20 in free tokens</strong> to start building</p></li><li><p>🔌 <strong>One-shot integrations</strong> with Hermes, WhatsApp &amp; Telegram</p></li><li><p>📄 <strong>Backed by in-house research:</strong> LoSoNA (social-norm benchmark) + HUMA (a human-passing group facilitator)</p></li><li><p>🔒 <strong>SOC 2 / ISO 27001</strong> in progress<br></p></li></ul><p><strong>Who It's for: </strong>Anyone building agents that must feel human, AI companions, NPCs, tutors, voice agents, groups, humanoids. If you've ever shipped an agent that was smart but experience using it felt wrong, Humalike is for you.<br></p><p><strong>What we'd love from you:</strong> Grab your $20 in tokens, and tell us, how did our APIs improve the experience? Try with Hermes, Openclaw, or any agent you have deployed! We'll be here all day reading every comment, your feedback shapes what we ship!<br></p><p>Backed by the first investors in ElevenLabs, Revolut &amp; more.<br><strong><em>Built by a tiny 🇪🇸×🇵🇱 team that hasn't slept much :))</em></strong></p>

[REDACTED]
↑ 9

<p>The Turn-Taking API is the part that jumps out at me. I build voice AI that calls elderly parents every day, and the single hardest thing has been the bot cutting people off. Older folks pause mid-sentence to find a word, and every VAD setup I've tried reads that silence as their turn ending. How does Turn-Taking handle long, uneven pauses? Is it purely acoustic timing, or does it factor in whether the thought is actually complete? Following to see where the benchmarks land.</p>

[REDACTED]
↑ 8

<p>Looks like "groups, not 1:1" framing is the one most people might underrate. Really good! Turn-taking in a 2-person chat is mostly a latency problem, but the second there are 4 people in the room the agent has to decide whether to speak at all, which is a completely different thing. </p><p></p><p>Wonder when you're stack-agnostic, how do you actually capture a deleted draft or a pulled reaction? I guess on most platforms that event never leaves the client</p><p></p>

[REDACTED]
↑ 7

<p>Theory of Mind is the hardest one to get right, honestly. <br><br>How are you evaluating whether it's actually working vs just inferring emotions in an obvious way?</p>

Sentiment computed via openai